Le texte complet de cette page n'a pas encore été traduit, il est donc affiché en anglais ci-dessous. Le résumé, les libellés et les informations de sécurité ci-dessus sont traduits.
Our article on off-campus speech and social media covers Mahanoy v. B.L. and the real protection students generally have for general complaints and criticism posted off-campus. Bullying that specifically targets another student is treated differently — it is evaluated under a school's anti-bullying obligations, not primarily as protected expression, and every state now has some form of law addressing it.
Every state has an anti-bullying law, but they're not identical
There is no single federal anti-bullying law, but all fifty states, D.C., and U.S. territories have adopted some form of anti-bullying law, policy, or regulation requiring schools to define bullying, adopt a policy, and respond to reports. The specific definition of bullying, whether cyberbullying is named explicitly, and how far off-campus conduct is covered all vary by state — this is exactly the kind of question where checking your own state's specific law, not a general national rule, actually answers the question.
The test schools generally use for off-campus conduct
Where a state or district's policy reaches off-campus cyberbullying, the standard usually asks whether the conduct has a genuine, documented connection to the school environment — for example, whether it creates a hostile environment that follows the targeted student into school, disrupts their ability to learn, or was created or shared using school accounts or devices. This is a narrower, more specific test than 'anything posted about a classmate ever,' and it's meant to be, since a school's authority over off-campus conduct is not unlimited.
This is a different legal question from Mahanoy, which is about protecting the speaker's general expression; here, the framing is about the school's obligation to protect the targeted student once harassment has a real, demonstrated effect at school.
What to actually document
Screenshots with visible dates and usernames, a record of when the behavior started and whether it's ongoing, and specifics on how it has affected being at school (missed classes, a change in a schedule to avoid someone, a drop in participation) are what turn a general complaint into something a school's investigation can actually work with. Report it in writing, not only in conversation, and ask specifically which policy the report falls under.
If the conduct includes a genuine threat of violence or involves sexual content, that can raise separate criminal-law and mandatory-reporting questions beyond the school's own bullying policy, and involving a parent, guardian, or trusted adult immediately is appropriate in that situation.
À retenir
- Every U.S. state has some anti-bullying law, but the specific definition and how far it reaches off-campus varies by state.
- Schools generally can address off-campus cyberbullying with a genuine, documented connection to the school environment.
- This is a different legal question from general off-campus speech protection — it's about protecting the targeted student, not restricting the speaker.
- Document dates, screenshots, and the specific effect on school life, and report in writing.
Sources
Cet article donne des informations éducatives générales, pas un conseil juridique personnalisé. KidsKnowRights n'est pas un cabinet d'avocats, et lire cet article ne crée pas de relation avocat-client. Les lois varient selon l'État, l'âge et les circonstances, et elles changent avec le temps. Pour un conseil sur une situation réelle, adresse-toi à un avocat agréé ou à un organisme d'aide juridique.