Il testo completo di questa pagina non è ancora stato tradotto, quindi qui sotto è mostrato in inglese. Il riepilogo, le etichette e le informazioni sulla sicurezza qui sopra sono tradotti.
Our article on off-campus speech and social media covers Mahanoy v. B.L. and the real protection students generally have for general complaints and criticism posted off-campus. Bullying that specifically targets another student is treated differently — it is evaluated under a school's anti-bullying obligations, not primarily as protected expression, and every state now has some form of law addressing it.
Every state has an anti-bullying law, but they're not identical
There is no single federal anti-bullying law, but all fifty states, D.C., and U.S. territories have adopted some form of anti-bullying law, policy, or regulation requiring schools to define bullying, adopt a policy, and respond to reports. The specific definition of bullying, whether cyberbullying is named explicitly, and how far off-campus conduct is covered all vary by state — this is exactly the kind of question where checking your own state's specific law, not a general national rule, actually answers the question.
The test schools generally use for off-campus conduct
Where a state or district's policy reaches off-campus cyberbullying, the standard usually asks whether the conduct has a genuine, documented connection to the school environment — for example, whether it creates a hostile environment that follows the targeted student into school, disrupts their ability to learn, or was created or shared using school accounts or devices. This is a narrower, more specific test than 'anything posted about a classmate ever,' and it's meant to be, since a school's authority over off-campus conduct is not unlimited.
This is a different legal question from Mahanoy, which is about protecting the speaker's general expression; here, the framing is about the school's obligation to protect the targeted student once harassment has a real, demonstrated effect at school.
What to actually document
Screenshots with visible dates and usernames, a record of when the behavior started and whether it's ongoing, and specifics on how it has affected being at school (missed classes, a change in a schedule to avoid someone, a drop in participation) are what turn a general complaint into something a school's investigation can actually work with. Report it in writing, not only in conversation, and ask specifically which policy the report falls under.
If the conduct includes a genuine threat of violence or involves sexual content, that can raise separate criminal-law and mandatory-reporting questions beyond the school's own bullying policy, and involving a parent, guardian, or trusted adult immediately is appropriate in that situation.
Da ricordare
- Every U.S. state has some anti-bullying law, but the specific definition and how far it reaches off-campus varies by state.
- Schools generally can address off-campus cyberbullying with a genuine, documented connection to the school environment.
- This is a different legal question from general off-campus speech protection — it's about protecting the targeted student, not restricting the speaker.
- Document dates, screenshots, and the specific effect on school life, and report in writing.
Fonti
Questo articolo offre informazioni educative generali, non consulenza legale personalizzata. KidsKnowRights non è uno studio legale, e leggere questo articolo non crea un rapporto avvocato-cliente. Le leggi cambiano a seconda dello stato, dell'età e delle circostanze, e cambiano nel tempo. Per un consiglio su una situazione reale, parla con un avvocato abilitato o con un'organizzazione di assistenza legale gratuita.