이 페이지의 전체 본문은 아직 번역되지 않아 아래에 영어로 표시돼요. 위의 요약, 라벨, 안전 정보는 번역되어 있어요.
A 16-year-old in Spokane, Washington is referred to juvenile court after spray-painting a wall behind a grocery store. A few weeks later, a letter invites him to meet with a diversion unit. Diversion is a path where a young person agrees to meet certain conditions, and in return the case does not go to a formal court hearing. For many first cases, it is the most likely outcome.
Two kinds of diversion
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), part of the U.S. Department of Justice, describes two broad kinds. In informal diversion, police may warn and release a young person, refer them to services, or hold charges for a set time. If there is no further contact with the law, the charges are dismissed.
Formal diversion usually comes after charges are filed. A prosecutor or judge refers the youth to a program. OJJDP says these programs often require an admission of guilt and an agreement to take part, and that finishing the terms usually means no further court processing.
That admission matters. It is one reason to talk with a lawyer first.
What an agreement can include: Washington as an example
Every state runs diversion its own way. Washington writes its rules into state law, RCW 13.40.080, and they show what a typical agreement looks like. A diversion agreement there is a contract between the young person and the diversion unit. It can include up to 150 hours of community restitution (unpaid community service), never during school hours for a student. It can require paying back the victim's actual loss and up to 10 hours of counseling or up to 20 hours of classes.
The agreement cannot last more than six months, though the young person can ask for six more. Parents cannot sign it for the youth or block the youth from signing. A young person can also say no and ask for the case to go to court at any time before signing.
Your right to a lawyer and a fair process
In re Gault (1967) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that gave young people in juvenile court the right to notice of the charges and to a lawyer. Washington's law carries that into diversion: the right to counsel starts before the first interview, and the unit must tell you about it at intake.
The same law says the only reason to end an agreement is a violation of its terms, and that ending it takes a court hearing with written notice first. If that happens, the prosecutor can file the original charge.
Before you sign anything
Ask for a lawyer before the first diversion interview. In most places a public defender can advise you for free. Read every condition and ask what happens if you miss one. Ask whether you must admit to the offense, and ask what record will remain once you finish.
Rules on records differ by state. Our article on sealing and expunging juvenile records explains what to ask about. Write down the date your agreement ends and keep proof of every hour and payment you complete.
기억하세요
- Diversion means meeting conditions instead of being prosecuted. Finishing them usually ends the case.
- Formal diversion often requires admitting the offense, so talk to a lawyer before you agree.
- In Washington, agreements are capped at 150 service hours and six months, and parents cannot sign for you.
- In re Gault (1967) gives young people in juvenile court the right to a lawyer. Use it at the diversion stage too.
출처
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Model Programs Guide literature review, Diversion from Formal Juvenile Court Processing (새 탭에서 열림)
- Washington State Legislature: RCW 13.40.080, Diversion agreement (새 탭에서 열림)
- Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School): In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (새 탭에서 열림)
이 글은 일반적인 교육 정보를 제공하며, 개인에게 맞춘 법률 자문이 아니에요. KidsKnowRights는 법률 사무소가 아니며, 이 글을 읽는다고 해서 변호사-의뢰인 관계가 생기지 않아요. 법은 주, 나이, 상황에 따라 다르고 시간이 지나면서 바뀌어요. 실제 상황에 대한 조언이 필요하면 면허가 있는 변호사나 법률 구조 단체와 상담하세요.