본문으로 건너뛰기
KidsKnowRights

Truancy and chronic absence: two different problems with two different responses

Missing school can trigger a legal process or a support process depending on which category a district puts it in — and the difference is not always explained to families.

글쓴이 Ian Massaro

Founder and President of KidsKnowRights5 분 분량

법률 전문가 검토 대기 중

주제:truancyattendancechronic absenceschool

이 글은 일반적인 교육 정보를 제공하며, 개인에게 맞춘 법률 자문이 아니에요. KidsKnowRights는 법률 사무소가 아니며, 이 글을 읽는다고 해서 변호사-의뢰인 관계가 생기지 않아요. 법은 주, 나이, 상황에 따라 다르고 시간이 지나면서 바뀌어요. 실제 상황에 대한 조언이 필요하면 면허가 있는 변호사나 법률 구조 단체와 상담하세요.

이 페이지의 전체 본문은 아직 번역되지 않아 아래에 영어로 표시돼요. 위의 요약, 라벨, 안전 정보는 번역되어 있어요.

Every state has compulsory attendance laws requiring young people to be in school between certain ages, and every state has some mechanism for responding when they are not. But districts generally track two different things that are easy to confuse: truancy, which counts unexcused absences and can carry legal consequences, and chronic absenteeism, which counts total days missed for any reason and is usually treated as a support question rather than a legal one.

Chronic absence counts every absence, excused or not

Chronic absenteeism is commonly defined as missing a set share of enrolled school days — often around ten percent — for any reason at all, including illness with a doctor's note. It is a measure the federal government asks states to report on, and it exists to identify students who are missing enough instruction to fall behind, regardless of why.

Because it includes excused absences, a student can be flagged as chronically absent while having done nothing wrong. A family told their child is chronically absent is usually being told about an instructional risk, not accused of breaking a law.

Truancy is the one with a legal process attached

Truancy generally counts unexcused absences specifically, and state law sets a threshold at which a district must act. What follows varies a great deal: a notice home, a required meeting, an attendance contract, a referral to a truancy officer or diversion program, and in some states court involvement or penalties that can fall on a parent.

The thresholds, the steps, and whether the matter can reach a court are all set by state law and district policy, so this is squarely a question to ask locally rather than to answer from a general rule.

What is behind the absences usually matters more than the count

중요

Absences often have a cause a school can actually address once it knows about it: an unmanaged health condition, a transportation problem, caring for a family member, unstable housing, or avoiding a specific class because of bullying. Several of those connect to rights covered elsewhere on this site — our articles on school when housing is unstable and on reporting bullying are the common ones.

Raising the reason in writing, early, generally moves the conversation from an attendance process to a support one. A student with a disability whose absences relate to that disability may also have a route through a 504 plan or an IEP rather than through the attendance office.

기억하세요

  • Chronic absenteeism counts all absences including excused ones; truancy counts unexcused absences specifically.
  • Truancy is the category with a legal process attached, and thresholds and consequences are set by state law.
  • Consequences in some states can fall on a parent as well as a student.
  • Tell the school the underlying reason in writing early — health, transport, housing, or bullying often have their own routes.

출처

이 글은 일반적인 교육 정보를 제공하며, 개인에게 맞춘 법률 자문이 아니에요. KidsKnowRights는 법률 사무소가 아니며, 이 글을 읽는다고 해서 변호사-의뢰인 관계가 생기지 않아요. 법은 주, 나이, 상황에 따라 다르고 시간이 지나면서 바뀌어요. 실제 상황에 대한 조언이 필요하면 면허가 있는 변호사나 법률 구조 단체와 상담하세요.