本页的正文尚未翻译,因此以下内容以英文显示。上方的摘要、标签和安全信息已翻译。
A 16-year-old walking home from a friend's house in Glendale is stopped by a police officer at 11 p.m. and asked where he is going. What happens next depends on rules Arizona wrote for people under 18, starting with section 8-303 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, which tells an officer what to do when a juvenile is taken into custody. The most famous juvenile rights case in the country, In re Gault (1967), also started in this state, with a 15-year-old from Gila County.
Custody, the juvenile Miranda warning, and the call home
Section 8-303 lets an officer take a juvenile into temporary custody without a warrant when there are reasonable grounds to believe the juvenile committed a delinquent act, which means something that would be a crime for an adult. When the act would be a felony or a breach of the peace, the statute says the officer must do three things. Before questioning, the officer must advise the juvenile of 'juvenile Miranda rights' in language a juvenile can understand. As soon as practicable, the officer must make a good faith effort to notify the parents, guardian, or custodian. Then the officer must explain those same rights to the parents.
The same section says a juvenile in temporary custody may not be held in a police station, jail, or lockup where adults charged with crimes are held, and may be released only to a parent, guardian, or custodian or to the juvenile court. If the custody happens on school grounds, a school employee must immediately notify the parents after checking with the investigating agency.
A warning is not the same as a lawyer. The right to have one comes from In re Gault (1967). Gerald Gault, 15, was sent to the State Industrial School by the Juvenile Court of Gila County without a lawyer or a real hearing. The Supreme Court held that a juvenile facing possible commitment must get notice of the charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the privilege against self-incrimination. In Arizona today, that means you can say you want a lawyer before answering questions, and then stop talking.
Juvenile court until 18, and when a case goes to adult court
In Arizona, the juvenile court is a division of the superior court in each county. The Arizona courts' Self-Service Center says it hears delinquency, incorrigibility (a child who keeps disobeying parents or the court), emancipation, and related matters. Section 8-202 gives it jurisdiction over offenses committed by people under 18, and section 13-501 says nothing in that section puts anyone 18 or older in juvenile court. Traffic tickets for juveniles may be sent to a regular court if the county's presiding judge allows it.
Some cases skip juvenile court. Under section 13-501, the county attorney must charge a 15-, 16-, or 17-year-old as an adult for first or second degree murder, forcible sexual assault, armed robbery, any other violent felony, or any felony if the juvenile is a chronic felony offender, meaning two prior separate felony-level adjudications. For other serious felonies, the county attorney may choose adult court for anyone 14 or older. A juvenile charged as a chronic felony offender can ask for a hearing before trial, and if the state cannot prove that history, the case goes back to juvenile court.
Records: asking the court to destroy the file
Arizona does not call it sealing. Section 8-349 lets a person who was adjudicated delinquent apply to the juvenile court to destroy their juvenile court and juvenile corrections records. At 18 you can apply if the case was not one of the adult-court offenses listed in section 13-501 or a driving offense under title 28, you finished probation, paid restitution, have no felony conviction and no pending charge, and are not on the sex offender registry. The court may then order the records destroyed.
If the offense was on the 13-501 list, the wait is longer: you can apply at 25 with a similar checklist. Fines can be modified by the court if you cannot pay them in full. The application is filed in the juvenile court of the county where the case was heard.
Curfews, lawyers, and where to look
The Glendale 16-year-old was out at 11 p.m. Whether that alone is a problem depends on his city, not the state. The Arizona statutes we read do not set a statewide youth curfew; curfews in Arizona are city or county ordinances, so search your city's name with 'curfew ordinance' and read the exceptions, especially the one for coming home from work.
If a case is filed, the juvenile court appoints a lawyer for a family that cannot afford one; that is the promise of Gault. In Arizona that lawyer usually comes from the county public defender's office, and the juvenile court clerk can tell you how to ask. Do not wait for the first hearing to ask.
The official starting points are azleg.gov for the statutes named here (8-303, 8-202, 13-501, and 8-349) and the Arizona courts' Self-Service Center at azcourts.gov, which has a Juvenile Law page with forms and a Spanish version, El Centro de Autoservicio. Write down the officer's agency and the date and time of any stop as soon as you can. Those three facts are what a lawyer will ask for first.
请记住
- Under section 8-303, an Arizona officer who takes a juvenile into custody for a felony-level act must give a juvenile Miranda warning before questioning and make a good faith effort to notify the parents.
- Juvenile court covers people under 18, but section 13-501 sends 15- to 17-year-olds accused of murder, armed robbery, and other violent felonies straight to adult court.
- At 18, section 8-349 lets you apply to destroy juvenile records for most offenses if probation is done and restitution is paid; for listed serious offenses the age is 25.
- In re Gault, an Arizona case, is why every juvenile facing commitment has the right to a lawyer; ask for one before answering questions.
资料来源
- Arizona Legislature: A.R.S. 8-303, Taking into temporary custody (在新标签页中打开)
- Arizona Legislature: A.R.S. 13-501, Persons under eighteen years of age; felony charging (在新标签页中打开)
- Arizona Legislature: A.R.S. 8-349, Destruction of juvenile records (在新标签页中打开)
- Legal Information Institute: In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (在新标签页中打开)
本文提供的是一般教育信息,不是针对个人的法律意见。KidsKnowRights 不是律师事务所,阅读本文不会建立律师与当事人的关系。法律因州、年龄和具体情况而异,也会随时间变化。如需针对真实情况的建议,请咨询持照律师或法律援助机构。