本页的正文尚未翻译，因此以下内容以英文显示。上方的摘要、标签和安全信息已翻译。
A 12-year-old in Houston gets free lunch at her middle school. She and her little brother were born in Texas, so they are U.S. citizens. Their mother is applying for a green card. After hearing about a new rule on the news, the mother asks whether she should take the kids off the lunch program so it does not hurt her case. That worry is common, and the answer depends on who is receiving the benefit and who is applying.
What public charge means and who it applies to
Public charge is a test in federal immigration law. An officer asks whether a person is likely at any time to depend on the government for support. If the answer is yes, the person can be denied a visa, entry, or a green card. The law says officers must at least consider the person's age, health, family status, money and resources, and education and skills.
The test does not apply to everyone. It applies to people applying for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status (changing to a green card from inside the country). Congress exempted several groups, including refugees, asylees, Special Immigrant Juveniles, and people applying for Temporary Protected Status. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says people who already have green cards face the test only in limited situations. U.S. citizen children are never subject to it.
What changed on September 18, 2026
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS, the agency that decides green card cases) announced that DHS rescinded its 2022 public charge rule. The 2022 rule looked mainly at cash assistance and long-term care in an institution paid by the government. The new rule lets officers look at any means-tested benefit (one you qualify for because of low income) on a case-by-case basis. It applies to applications filed on or after September 18, 2026. Benefits received before that date are judged under the older 2022 limits.
DHS declined to exclude school lunch from what officers may consider for the person who is applying. But the rule also says DHS will generally not consider benefits received by the applicant's family members, unless that family member is also applying and subject to the test. The Houston children's lunches are their own benefit, not their mother's. One narrow exception in the rule: officers may note it if the evidence shows family members the applicant must support get benefits because the applicant's own income is below the required level, or if those benefits are the applicant's source of support.
School itself, and what to do next
In Plyler v. Doe (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a state cannot deny children a free public education because of their immigration status. Enrolling in public school does not depend on income, and nothing in the new rule changes that right. Keep going to school.
For meals, health coverage, or other programs, the answer depends on each person's status and case. Before anyone drops a benefit a child needs, the adult who is applying should talk to a nonprofit immigration lawyer or a DOJ-accredited representative (a non-lawyer approved by the U.S. Department of Justice to give immigration help). The Justice Department publishes a list of recognized organizations by state. Bring the list of benefits each family member receives, and who in the family is applying.
请记住
- Public charge applies only to people applying for a visa, entry, or a green card, and never to U.S. citizen children.
- Since September 18, 2026, officers can weigh any means-tested benefit the applicant receives, case by case.
- DHS says it will generally not count benefits received by family members who are not themselves applying.
- Plyler v. Doe (1982) protects every child's right to public school; ask an accredited legal helper before dropping other benefits.
资料来源
本文提供的是一般教育信息，不是针对个人的法律意见。KidsKnowRights 不是律师事务所，阅读本文不会建立律师与当事人的关系。法律因州、年龄和具体情况而异，也会随时间变化。如需针对真实情况的建议，请咨询持照律师或法律援助机构。